The court legally supported preservation measures for community property that might be transferred, ensuring smooth property division.
The court clarified that either party has the right to withdraw the divorce registration application during the cooling-off period, and the divorce procedure terminates after withdrawal.
The court held that separation for two years with unsuccessful mediation constitutes one of the statutory grounds for granting divorce.
The court held that adding a spouse's name to premarital property after marriage constitutes a gift to the other party, and division upon divorce may comprehensively consider factors such as contribution.
This case clarifies that a notarized premarital property agreement is legally binding, and both parties shall divide property according to the agreement.
The court held that property agreements between spouses shall be in writing, and oral agreements cannot override the statutory property system.
The court held that stepchildren who have formed a nurturing relationship have inheritance rights to the stepparent's estate according to law.
When parties have not registered marriage but have cohabited for many years, the court ordered discretionary return of part of the betrothal gifts based on actual circumstances.
The court legally supported a full-time housewife's claim for compensation for domestic work upon divorce, fully affirming the social value of domestic labor.
This case involves divorce caused by domestic violence, where the innocent party obtained compensation for mental distress and medical expenses according to law.
For debts beyond daily family needs, the court strictly applies burden of proof rules. If the creditor fails to prove the debt was used for common life, it will not be recognized.
This judgment clarifies the statutory circumstances and court's discretion standards for modifying child custody.
If concealed property is discovered after divorce, the other party may request re-division according to law. This case clarifies the standards for determining concealment.
One party waived all property at divorce and later requested revocation on the grounds of manifest unfairness. The court held the agreement legal and valid.
This case involves the ownership of rental income and appreciation of premarital personal property after marriage. The court held that the rental income and appreciation part belong to community property.